Thursday, September 9, 2010

Goldman Sachs Fined $27 For Failing to Report SEC Probe

Goldman Sachs Fraud The London division of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. was fined $27 million (17.5 million pounds) today for failure to inform the U.K.’s financial regulatory committee about a fraud investigation looking into them by the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In July, Goldman Sachs settled the SEC's fraud lawsuit regarding how Sachs marketed a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) for $550 million. Goldman Sachs failed to report the investigation to U.K. regulators and was fined today by The Financial Services Authority for failure to do so, according to a statement from the FSA. For cooperating, Goldman Sachs qualifies for the for the agency’s 30 percent discount.

Margaret Cole, the FSA enforcement chief,had this to say, “GSI did not set out to hide anything, but its defective systems and controls meant that the level and quality of its communications with the FSA fell far below what we expect,”

In April, the SEC sued Goldman Sachs and its employee Fabrice Tourre alleging that the firm intentionally misled investors in a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that was linked to subprime mortgages. Additionally, the FSA said it would launch an investigation into Goldman Sachs International of London after learning that the SEC had filed its lawsuit. The FSA was asked to investigate by Gordon Brown, the British prime minister at the time and was looking towards a May election.

In 2007, Goldman Sachs created and sold CDO's as the U.S. housing market began to stumble and falter. According to an SEC statement made on April 16, they did so without disclosing to investors that the that hedge fund Paulson & Co. had helped to choose the underlying securities and had bet against the investment vehicles. Collateralized debt obligations or CDOs are accumulations of assets like mortgage bonds that have been packaged into new securities.


Tourre Remains an Employee


Goldman Sachs spokeswoman Fiona Laffan remarked, "We’re pleased the matter is resolved," following the FSA announcement, and that Tourre “remains an employee on paid leave,”.

The SEC spent close to a year acquiring witness testimony and documents about Abacus, the name given the CDO by Sachs. The commission even went so far as to interview Goldman Sachs London-based employees. The SEC then informed Tourre and Goldman Sachs that they were proceeding with an enforcement action. However, according to the FSA the bank’s compliance department in London learned of the SEC investigation only after the SEC had filed the lawsuit this year.

This will be the second-largest put forth by the FSA. The largest fine received from the FSA was JPMorgan Chase & Co. in June after its London division was fined 33.3 million pounds for not segregating client's money properly from the firm’s own accounts.

The U.S. settlement with Goldman Sachs includes a $300 million fine as well as $250 million in restitution to be paid to investors. The fine and penalty are the largest ever imposed by the SEC against a Wall Street firm. Goldman Sachs did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but instead acknowledged they had made a “mistake” and acknowledged that the marketing materials created for the CDOs had “incomplete information,” according to the SEC.

Tourre's FSA authorization was suspended in April at the banks request and he remains a defendant in the U.S. case. The SEC allegations are in relation to when he worked in New York.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Goldman Sachs Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Goldman Sachs lawsuit
On April 16th, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed charged against Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of the its vice presidents with defrauding investors.  The SEC is alleging that Goldman Sachs both omitted and misstated misstated crucial facts pertaining to a financial product that were tied to subprime mortgages, just as the U.S. housing market began to falter.


More Information

Litigation Release No. 21489
SEC Complaint

The SEC lawsuit is alleging that Goldman Sachs put together and promoted a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that was based soley on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The fraud occurred when Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors crucial information about the CDO, most notably the role that a major hedge fund played in the selection of the portfolio, with said hedge fund having taken a short position against the CDO.

"Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party." said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement.

The lawsuit alleges that Paulson & Co., one of the world's largest hedge funds, gave money to Goldman Sachs to manufacture a transaction so that Paulson & Co. could take a short position against the mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. in the belief that the securities would have credit disruptions.

After playing a major in the selection of the portfolio, it is alleged that Paulson & Co. was able to short the RMBS portfolio that it had helped design by entering into credit default swaps (CDS) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. to purchase investment protection within specific layers of the ABACUS capital structure. Goldman Sachs did not inform investors about Paulson & Co.'s short position or its part in the selection process of the offering memorandum and marketing materials that were provided to them.

The SEC also names Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre in the lawsuit as being principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. It is alleged that Tourre put together the transaction, prepared and conceived the marketing materials, and spoke directly with investors. The SEC further alleges that Tourre knew of Paulson & Co.'s short interest and the part it played within the collateral selection process. Tourre is charged with leading the ACA into believing that Paulson & Co. had invested close to $200 million into the equity of ABACUS, creating the belief that Paulson & Co.'s interests in the collateral selection process were parallel with the ACA's interests. In truth, their interests were vastly different.

The SEC's complaint states that the deal was closed on April 26, 2007, with Paulson & Co. paying Goldman Sachs around $15 million for building and selling ABACUS. 83 percent of the RMBS that was in the ABACUS portfolio had been severely downgraded and the additional 17 percent were on negative watch by Oct. 24, 2007, . By Jan. 29, 2008, over 99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded.

It is alleged that investors in ABACUS have lost over $1 billion. The SEC's filing charges Goldman Sachs and Tourre with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks an injunction, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.